Modulaciones de la microbiota fecal como factor de riesgo y cuantificación pronóstica para el cáncer colorrectal: una revisión de la literatura

Autores/as

  • Bruno Menezes Teixeira Campos Universidade de Vassouras - Univassouras
  • Ana Beatriz de Mello Domingos Universidade de Vassouras - Univassouras
  • Lara Oliveira Holak dos Santos
  • Bruna Cristina Moreira Santos Universidade de Vassouras - Univassouras
  • Adriana Rodrigues Ferraz Universidade de Vassouras - Univassouras

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24859/SaberDigital.2025v18n1.1644

Palabras clave:

Neoplasias Colorrectales, Microbioma Gastrointestinal, Dieta, Biomarcadores de Tumor

Resumen

Introducción: El cáncer colorrectal (CCR) es un tumor maligno de alta incidencia en Brasil que genera una significativa morbimortalidad y elevados costos para la salud pública. Los casos están en aumento, principalmente entre los jóvenes, debido a los estilos de vida, especialmente los hábitos alimenticios que alteran la microbiota intestinal del huésped, lo que constituye un factor carcinogénico. Objetivo: Correlacionar la microbiota con la incidencia de CCR, donde la alimentación actúa como factor de riesgo y protector, además de que esta alteración microbiológica puede servir como un posible biomarcador tumoral para métodos de detección y pronóstico. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó una revisión sistemática en PubMed y en la Biblioteca Virtual en Salud utilizando los descriptores “colorectal cancer” y “fecal microbiome”. Se incluyeron publicaciones de los últimos 5 años, ensayos clínicos controlados, estudios observacionales y textos completos. Se excluyeron artículos de revisión, pagos y fuera del tema propuesto. Se analizaron 22 artículos. Resultados y discusión: A través de los estudios analizados, se observó que bacterias como Fusobacterium nucleatum condicionan un ambiente proinflamatorio y afectan la carcinogénesis de las células intestinales. Se señaló la dieta como un importante factor de riesgo (carne roja, alimentos procesados) y también protector (fibras, vegetales), influyendo directamente en el estado inflamatorio. Las alteraciones en la composición de la microbiota permiten su uso como biomarcadores de CCR, con posible aplicabilidad en el diagnóstico, la evaluación del tratamiento y su eficacia. Conclusión: Las bacterias favorecen la aparición del CCR a través de metaplasias condicionadas por la virulencia aumentada por la alimentación, y su análisis puede funcionar como un biomarcador tumoral eficiente para el diagnóstico, la evaluación terapéutica y el pronóstico.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

AGARWAL, A.; ZHANG, T.; RAVINDRAN, N.; et al. Off-Label Use of Multitarget Stool DNA Testing in Primary Care. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, v. 116, n. 4, p. 829–832, 1 abr. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000001143

ASLAM, M. N.; BASSIS, C. M.; BERGIN, I. L.; et al. A Calcium-Rich Multimineral Intervention to Modulate Colonic Microbial Communities and Metabolomic Profiles in Humans: Results from a 90-Day Trial. Cancer Prevention Research, v. 13, n. 1, p. 101–116, jan. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-19-0325

BOSCH, S.; ACHARJEE, A.; QURAISHI, M. N.; et al. Integration of stool microbiota, proteome and amino acid profiles to discriminate patients with adenomas and colorectal cancer. Gut microbes, v. 14, n. 1, p. e2139979, nov. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2022.2139979

BOSCH, S.; ACHARJEE, A.; QURAISHI, M. N.; et al. The potential of fecal microbiota and amino acids to detect and monitor patients with adenoma. Gut microbes, v. 14, n. 1, p. e2038863, fev. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2022.2038863

BUCHER-JOHANNESSEN, C.; BIRKELAND, E.; VINBERG, E.; et al. Long-term follow-up of colorectal cancer screening attendees identifies differences in Phascolarctobacterium spp. using 16S rRNA and metagenome sequencing. Frontiers in Oncology, v. 13, p. e1183039, abr. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1183039

ECKMANN, J. D.; EBNER, D. W.; KISIEL, J. B. Multi-Target Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Emerging Learning on Real-world Performance. Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology, v. 18, n. 1, p. 109–119, jan. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11938-020-00271-5

EISELE, Y.; MALLEA, P. M.; GIGIC, B.; et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum and Clinicopathologic Features of Colorectal Cancer: Results From the ColoCare Study. Clinical Colorectal Cancer, , v. 20, n. 3, p. e165–e172, set. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2021.02.007

FAN, J.Q.; ZHAO, W. F.; LU, Q. W.; et al. Fecal microbial biomarkers combined with multi-target stool DNA test improve diagnostic accuracy for colorectal cancer. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, v. 15, n. 8, p. 1424–1435, ago. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v15.i8.1424

FARSI, D. N.; GALLEGOS, J. L.; KOUTSIDIS, G.; et al. Substituting meat for mycoprotein reduces genotoxicity and increases the abundance of beneficial microbes in the gut: Mycomeat, a randomised crossover control trial. European Journal of Nutrition, v. 62, n. 3, p. 1479-1492, jan. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-023-03088-x

FRUGÉ, A. D.; SMITH, K. S.; RIVIERE, A. J.; et al. A Dietary Intervention High in Green Leafy Vegetables Reduces Oxidative DNA Damage in Adults at Increased Risk of Colorectal Cancer: Biological Outcomes of the Randomized Controlled Meat and Three Greens (M3G) Feasibility Trial. Nutrients, v. 13, n. 4, p. 1220, abr. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13041220

HAGHI, F.; GOLI, E.; MIRZAEI, B.; et. al. The association between fecal enterotoxigenic B. fragilis with colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer, v. 19, n. 1, p. 879, set. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-6115-1

INCA - Estatísticas de câncer. Instituto Nacional de Câncer. Ministério da Saúde [Internet]. Distrito Federal. 2022 jun. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/inca/pt-br/assuntos/cancer/numeros. Acesso em: ago 2023.

JUNG, S. Y.; ZHANG, Z.-F. The effects of genetic variants related to insulin metabolism pathways and the interactions with lifestyles on colorectal cancer risk. Menopause, v. 26, n. 7, p. 771–780, jul. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000001301

KOSTIC, A. D.; CHUN, E.; ROBERTSON, L.; et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum Potentiates Intestinal Tumorigenesis and Modulates the Tumor-Immune Microenvironment. Cell Host & Microbe, v. 14, n. 2, p. 207–215, ago. 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2013.07.007

LAVELLE, A.; NANCEY, S.; REIMUND, J. M.; et al. Fecal microbiota and bile acids in IBD patients undergoing screening for colorectal cancer. Gut Microbes, v. 14, n. 1, p. e2078620, mai. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2022.2078620

LONG, S.; YANG, Y.; SHEN, C.; et al. Metaproteomics characterizes human gut microbiome function in colorectal cancer. npj Biofilms and Microbiomes, v. 6, n. 14, p. 1-10, mar. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-020-0123-4

MCQUADE, J. L.; DANIEL, C. R.; HELMINK, B. A.; et al. Modulating the microbiome to improve therapeutic response in cancer. The Lancet Oncology, v. 20, n. 2, p. e77–e91, fev. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30952-5

MIMA, K.; NISHIHARA, R.; QIAN, Z. R.; et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum in colorectal carcinoma tissue and patient prognosis. Gut, v. 65, n. 12, p. 1973–1980, dez. 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310101

OCVIRK, S.; WILSON, A. S.; POSMA, J. M.; et al. A prospective cohort analysis of gut microbial co-metabolism in Alaska Native and rural African people at high and low risk of colorectal cancer. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, v. 111, n. 2, p. 406-419, fev. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqz301

OSMAN, M. A.; NEOH, H.; AB MUTALIB, N. S.; et al. Parvimonas micra, Peptostreptococcus stomatis, Fusobacterium nucleatum and Akkermansia muciniphila as a four-bacteria biomarker panel of colorectal cancer. Scientific Reports, v. 11, n. 1, p. 2925, fev. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82465-0

RUBINSTEIN, M.; WANG, X.; LIU, W.; et al. Fusobacterium nucleatum Promotes Colorectal Carcinogenesis by Modulating E-Cadherin/β-Catenin Signaling via its FadA Adhesin. Cell Host & Microbe, v. 14, n. 2, p. 195–206, ago. 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2013.07.012

RUSSO, E.; GLORIA, L. D.; NANNINI, G.; et al. From adenoma to CRC stages: the oral-gut microbiome axis as a source of potential microbial and metabolic biomarkers of malignancy. Neoplasia (New York, NY), v. 40, p. 100901, 1 jun. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2023.100901

SERRANO, D.; POZZI, C.; GUGLIETTA, S.; et al. Microbiome as Mediator of Diet on Colorectal Cancer Risk: The Role of Vitamin D, Markers of Inflammation and Adipokines. Nutrients, v. 13, n. 2, p. 363, jan. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13020363

SO, W. K. W.; CHAN, J. Y. W.; LAW, B. M. H.; et al. Effects of a Rice Bran Dietary Intervention on the Composition of the Intestinal Microbiota of Adults with a High Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Pilot Randomised-Controlled Trial. Nutrients, v. 13, n. 2, p. 526, fev. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13020526

SOBHANI, I.; BERGSTEN, E.; COUFFIN, S.; et al. Colorectal cancer-associated microbiota contributes to oncogenic epigenetic signatures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 116, n. 48, p. 24285–24295, nov. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912129116

TAN, R.; DONG, H.; CHEN, Z.; et al. Intestinal Microbiota Mediates High-Fructose and High-Fat Diets to Induce Chronic Intestinal Inflammation. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, v. 11, p. 654074, jun. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.654074

TARALLO, S.; FERRERO, G.; GALLO, G.; et al. Altered Fecal Small RNA Profiles in Colorectal Cancer Reflect Gut Microbiome Composition in Stool Samples. mSystems, v. 4, n. 4, p. e00289-19, out. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00289-19

VAUPEL, P.; HARRISON, L. Tumor hypoxia: causative factors, compensatory mechanisms, and cellular response. The Oncologist, v. 9 Suppl 5, p. 4–9, nov. 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.9-90005-4

WANG, D.; MENG, S.; LI, J.; et al. Associations of Adherence to the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund and the American Institute for Cancer Research Dietary Recommendations with Gut Microbiota and Inflammation Levels. Nutrients, v. 15, n. 17, p. 3705–3705, ago. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15173705

WEBER, A.; IBRAHIM, H.; BAXTER, B. A.; et al. Integrated Microbiota and Metabolite Changes following Rice Bran Intake during Murine Inflammatory Colitis-Associated Colon Cancer and in Colorectal Cancer Survivors. Cancers, v. 15, n. 8, p. 2231–2231, abr. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15082231

WENG, M.T.; CHIU, Y.T.; WEI, P. Y.; et al. Microbiota and gastrointestinal cancer. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, Taiwan, v. 118 Suppl 1, p. S32–S41, mar. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2019.01.002

YACHIDA, S.; MIZUTANI, S.; SHIROMA, H.; et al. Metagenomic and metabolomic analyses reveal distinct stage-specific phenotypes of the gut microbiota in colorectal cancer. Nature Medicine, v. 25, n. 6, p. 968–976, jun. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0458-7

YANG, Y.; DU, L.; SHI, D.; et al. Dysbiosis of human gut microbiome in young-onset colorectal cancer. Nature Communications, v. 12, n. 1, p. 6757, nov. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27112-y

YANG. Y.; MISRA, B. B.; LIANG, L.; et al. Integrated microbiome and metabolome analysis reveals a novel interplay between commensal bacteria and metabolites in colorectal cancer. Theranostics, v. 9, n. 14, p. 4101–4114, mai. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.35186

ZHANG, Y.; YU, X.; YU, E.; et al. Changes in gut microbiota and plasma inflammatory factors across the stages of colorectal tumorigenesis: a case-control study. BMC Microbiology, v. 18, n. 1, p. 92, ago. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-018-1232-6

Publicado

2025-02-03

Cómo citar

Menezes Teixeira Campos, B., de Mello Domingos, A. B., Oliveira Holak dos Santos, L. ., Moreira Santos, B. C., & Rodrigues Ferraz, A. (2025). Modulaciones de la microbiota fecal como factor de riesgo y cuantificación pronóstica para el cáncer colorrectal: una revisión de la literatura. Revista Saber Digital, 18(1), e20251804. https://doi.org/10.24859/SaberDigital.2025v18n1.1644

Número

Sección

Medicina